The contemporary philanthropic landscape is constantly evolving, aiming not only to address the symptoms of societal issues but also to alter the very systems perpetuating these challenges. This approach, known as “systems change”, seeks to bring about transformative adjustments to underlying structures and mechanisms in society, aiming to bring lasting, impactful changes. However, achieving this is no small feat. One of the most profound challenges lies in the reality that many of these systems are structured “for the systems, by the systems, and of the systems.” However, what does this mean, and how does it impede progress in philanthropy aimed at systems change?
1. For the Systems
This aspect denotes systems that exist primarily to sustain themselves. Think of the vast bureaucratic structures, both governmental and in the private sector, that seem more invested in maintaining the status quo than driving significant reform. When philanthropic efforts seek to alter these systems, they often confront entrenched interests and inertia. The larger and older the system, the more it can resist change, especially if it perceives that change as a threat to its existence.
2. By the Systems
Here, the emphasis is on systems that create self-sustaining feedback loops. For instance, a flawed educational system might produce citizens who are not encouraged to think critically about that very system. As a result, they might not see the need for change or might not have the tools to bring about that change. When the products of a system are the ones responsible for its oversight and evolution, inherent biases can stifle innovation and reform. Philanthropic endeavors, no matter how well intentioned, face an uphill battle when the people they aim to assist are inadvertently contributing to the perpetuation of the very challenges the philanthropy aims to address.
3. Of the Systems
Systems are constructed from societal norms, values, and shared beliefs. These foundational elements dictate the system’s behavior and trajectory. But if these underlying beliefs are misaligned with the goals of a philanthropic initiative, resistance ensues. For example, a society that highly values individual achievement might resist systemic changes that emphasize communal welfare. Alternatively, a community that holds traditional medical beliefs might be skeptical of health initiatives promoting modern medical practices. Changing these deep-seated beliefs requires more than just funds or resources; it demands a shift in collective consciousness.
Despite these formidable challenges, the 4th African Philanthropy Conference in Senegal was a beacon of hope and inspiration. Hosted by the East Africa Philanthropy Network, the on ‘systems change and philanthropy’ was more than just a passive listening exercise. It became a treasure trove of dynamic interactions, deep dives into lived experiences, and tangible action points for the future. Here is a distillation of the enlightenment I gathered:
Investing in Change
The key takeaway here is that change is not just a game of words; it is an action-driven mission. Committing to reshape policies and practices is not a whim; it requires the rigorous deployment of both time and resources. In addition, it is not just about the quantum but the quality of the investment – pinpointed, strategic, and reflective of the long-term vision.
Break the Cycle
The insidious nature of systemic problems often lies in their self-perpetuating cycles. The session stressed on the essentiality of proactive innovation, emphasizing that only by breaking free from outdated strategies can we catalyze transformative change. It is about agility, adaptability, and the audacity to think differently.
Selective Alignment
The philanthropic domain is a vibrant marketplace of ideas and methods. However, not everything that shines is gold. There is a strong call to align selectively with strategies that resonate with our core ethos and objectives. By sifting through the noise and picking what aligns, the impact can be maximized.
Power Equilibrium
A standout learning was about the delicate balance of power. Change is not just about implementing new programs but also about changing dynamics. Recognizing and addressing our inherent biases ensures that communities are not just beneficiaries but become active stakeholders in their destiny.
Partners, not Saviors
One cannot emphasize enough the importance of this perspective shift. It is about changing the narrative from a top-down approach to a partnership model. Communities have a vast reservoir of knowledge and skills. Recognizing and leveraging this potential can amplify the success of any initiative.
Rethinking Capacity Development
The conventional model of capacity development often resembles a one-size-fits-all approach. The session spotlighted the need to pivot: instead of molding individuals and communities to fit predefined capacities, the emphasis should be on personalized, needs-based development.
Partnerships as a Catalyst
The Safaricom Foundation’s case study was a testament to the monumental change that collaborative models can usher. Beyond pooling resources, it is about ideation, leveraging technology, and driving change through collective intelligence.
Focused Support
Direct, meaningful engagements with communities provide insights that no amount of desk research can. Being on the ground, understanding aspirations, challenges, and cultural shades ensure that our interventions are not just well intentioned but well directed.
To wrap up, the path to systems change in philanthropy is strewn with challenges. Nevertheless, the session reaffirmed, with deep insights, collaborative spirit, and staunch commitment, transformation is not just possible but achievable. The journey may be arduous, but the destination – a world with equitable, sustainable systems – makes every step worth the effort – Smooth seas do not make skilful sailors.
Purity Mumo, is the Communications Lead at the East Africa Philanthropy Network (EAPN)
Credit:Source link
